SEO for Plumbers · The Comparison

Local SEO vs MyBuilder, Checkatrade and Rated People for Plumbers

The platforms deliver real leads, at a price, shared with your competitors, on an asset you'll never own. Here is the honest comparison, the true cost per job, and the transition that keeps the diary full.

Updated: July 2026
Written by: Andrew Odgers, Managing Director
Reading time: 7 minutes
The short answer

The platforms are lead marketplaces: fees or per-lead charges (structures vary, check current terms) buy enquiries that are shared with competing trades and priced by the platform. They are genuinely good for fast starts and gap-filling. But count the real cost per won job, lead fee times leads-per-win, plus price-war margin, against SEO's exclusive enquiries at a falling marginal cost, and note where the value lands: platform years build the platform; SEO years build you, rankings, reviews and pages you keep. The move: run both during transition, point every review at your own profile, and shift the weight as the owned pipeline proves itself.

The honest mechanics

How the platforms work, what they are genuinely good for, and the real cost per job

Credit the platforms honestly first, because most plumbers reading this already use one. MyBuilder, Checkatrade and Rated People are lead marketplaces: broadly, plumbers pay through membership fees or per-lead and per-shortlist charges, structures that vary by platform and change over time, so check the current terms, and receive enquiries the platform captured through its own advertising and search rankings. The customer posts a job or browses profiles, several trades respond, one wins. The platforms are genuinely good at two things: speed, a new firm gets enquiries in week one, long before any website could rank, and gap-filling, quiet patches in an established diary, instant presence in a new area. A sensible strategy uses both. The comparison begins when you count past the sticker price. A platform lead is typically shared with several competing trades, so the real cost per won job is the lead fee multiplied by the leads needed to win one, plus the quieter cost, the margin surrendered when jobs are won on price against the same lead list, quoting against three others who received the identical notification. An SEO enquiry arrives differently: exclusive, from a customer who found your boiler page or your profile and chose to call you, often pre-sold by the reviews before dialling. The retainer is a real monthly cost, ours is £350 all in, but it buys every enquiry the rankings produce that month, at a marginal cost that falls as the rankings strengthen, the compounding described throughout the complete guide. Run both numbers over a year with your own figures; the direction is usually decisive.

RENTED

The platform lead

Shared with competitors, priced by the platform, won on price: real enquiries on someone else's asset.

OWNED

The search enquiry

Exclusive, pre-sold by your reviews, at a marginal cost that falls as rankings strengthen.

THE MOVE

Shift the weight

Both during transition, every review to your own profile, platform spend scaled as the owned pipeline proves.

The asymmetry and the transition

Renting versus owning, and the switch that never empties the diary

The heart of the comparison is not any flaw in the platforms; it is where the value accumulates. Every year on a platform builds the platform: your fees fund its advertising, your reviews strengthen its domain, your profile deepens its coverage of your patch, and if you ever leave, all of it stays behind, the reviews unportable, the presence gone with the subscription. Every year of local SEO builds you: rankings that persist, a review base on your own Google profile that no exit forfeits, job pages and the town coverage from the multi-area playbook that keep producing after the work that built them. Both cost money; only one compounds in your name. The transition, then, is a weight-shift rather than a jump, because the diary must stay full throughout. Keep the platform presence while the owned rankings build through their first months. Point everything you control at the asset you own: every satisfied customer, from whatever source, directed to review your own Google profile; your website, not your platform profile, on the van, the cards and the invoices; and your brand searches landing on your site, since a customer recommended to you by name should never end up on a platform page choosing between you and three competitors. Watch the share of work arriving from your own rankings grow in the monthly reporting, scale the platform spend down as the owned pipeline proves itself, and keep whatever membership still genuinely pays its way. The endpoint is not ideology; it is choice: a firm whose own presence fills the diary, using the platforms tactically when useful and needing them never, which is a very different negotiating position from needing them always, and it is the position every pound of the retainer is buying.

SEO done properly, from £350 a month

Stop renting the phone.
Start owning the rankings.

We build the owned pipeline, profile, job pages, town coverage and reviews, while your platform presence keeps the diary full, and the monthly report shows the weight shifting.

Everything included in your plan:

Google Maps optimisation Full website management Local SEO campaign AI optimisation (GEO) Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn Quarterly audits Monthly reporting
£350 per month

One clear retainer. No setup fee.

Frequently asked

Platforms vs local SEO

How do MyBuilder, Checkatrade and Rated People actually work for plumbers?
As lead marketplaces, each with its own model: broadly, plumbers pay through membership fees, per-lead or per-shortlist charges, structures that vary by platform and change over time, so check the current terms, and in return receive customer enquiries the platform has captured through its own advertising and search rankings. The customer typically posts a job or browses profiles, several trades respond, and the work goes to one of them. The platforms deliver real enquiries; the questions are what each enquiry truly costs once competition and conversion are counted, and who owns the asset being built.
What are the platforms genuinely good for?
Speed and gap-filling, honestly credited. A new plumbing business gets enquiries in week one, long before any website could rank; an established firm fills quiet patches in the diary; and a firm entering a new area buys instant presence there. Those are real benefits, and the sensible strategy uses them. The limitation is structural rather than a flaw: the leads are rented, shared with competitors, and priced by the platform, so the platform's role is best understood as a bridge and a buffer, not a foundation.
What does a platform lead really cost compared to an SEO enquiry?
Count past the sticker price. A platform lead is typically shared with several competing trades, so the real cost per won job is the lead fee multiplied by the number of leads needed to win one, plus the margin lost when jobs are won on price against the same lead list. An SEO enquiry arrives exclusively, from a customer who chose to call you, and while the retainer is a real monthly cost, it buys every enquiry the rankings produce that month, at a marginal cost that falls as rankings strengthen. Run both numbers over a year with your own figures; the direction is usually decisive.
What is the renting versus owning argument?
Where the value accumulates. Every year on a platform builds the platform: your fees fund its advertising, your reviews strengthen its domain, your profile deepens its coverage, and if you leave, all of it stays behind. Every year of local SEO builds you: rankings, a review base on your own Google profile, job pages and town coverage that keep producing after the work that built them, per the complete guide. Both cost money; only one compounds in your name. That asymmetry, not any flaw in the platforms, is the heart of the comparison.
Should a plumber leave the platforms once SEO works?
Shift the weight rather than jump. The sensible transition: keep the platform presence while the owned rankings build, since the diary must stay full through the SEO ramp-up; direct every satisfied customer, from whatever source, to review your own Google profile, the review base you keep; watch the share of work arriving from your own rankings grow; and scale the platform spend down as the owned pipeline proves itself, keeping any membership that still pays its way. The endpoint is choice: platforms used tactically when useful, no longer needed structurally.
Can a plumber run both platforms and SEO well?
Yes, and during the transition most should, with one discipline: point everything you control at the asset you own. Reviews go to your Google profile first; your website, not your platform profile, is the destination on your van, cards and invoices; your brand searches must land on your site, since a customer recommended to you should never end up choosing from your competitors on a platform's page. Run the platforms as a channel, build the presence you own underneath, and let the arithmetic move the budget over time.