Google Analytics · Background

GA4 vs Universal Analytics: What Changed and Why It Matters

If you remember the old Analytics, GA4 can feel like a different tool, because it is. Here is what changed between GA4 and Universal Analytics, why Google retired UA, what the event-based model changed, and what it means for your old data.

Updated: July 2026
Written by: Andrew Odgers, Managing Director
Reading time: 9 minutes
The short answer

GA4 is event-based; Universal Analytics was session-based, built around visits and pageviews. Google retired UA and stopped it processing new data. The event model changed conversions and replaced bounce rate with engagement metrics. Old UA data did not automatically move into GA4. You cannot compare GA4 and UA numbers directly, they count differently.

A different model

The core difference, and why UA was retired

The core difference is the model: GA4 is event-based, treating every interaction as an event, while Universal Analytics was session-based, built around visits and pageviews. The measurement approach changed; because the whole model differs, GA4 reports and metrics look and behave differently, which is why events now sit at the centre. Google retired Universal Analytics and moved everyone to GA4, which stopped UA processing new data, to fit modern privacy, cross-device tracking and an event-based web. It was a deliberate replacement; because UA no longer processes data, GA4 is now the standard.

UA 01

Events vs sessions

The core shift.

UA 02

UA retired

No new data.

UA 03

Fresh baseline

History separate.

Metrics, old data and comparisons

What the event model changed, your old data, and why numbers will not match

The event model replaced fixed session metrics with flexible events, changed how conversions work, and introduced engagement metrics in place of the old bounce rate. Familiar metrics shifted; because events underpin everything, reports needed rethinking rather than a simple copy, including the new engagement rate. Universal Analytics data did not automatically move into GA4, so historical UA figures are separate and, once access ends, need exporting to keep. History does not carry over; because the platforms are distinct, treat GA4 as a fresh start with its own baseline. The two count things differently, so metrics like users and sessions will not match exactly between them. Direct comparison misleads; because definitions changed, judge GA4 on its own terms rather than expecting it to mirror UA.

SEO done properly, from £350 a month

Make sense
of GA4.

If GA4 still feels alien after the switch from Universal Analytics, we set it up properly and translate the reports into plain answers about your business.

Everything included in your plan:

Google Maps optimisation Full website management Local SEO campaign AI optimisation (GEO) Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn Quarterly audits Monthly reporting
£350 per month

One clear retainer. No setup fee.

Frequently asked

GA4 vs Universal Analytics

What is the difference between GA4 and Universal Analytics?
The core difference is the model: GA4 is event-based, treating every interaction as an event, while Universal Analytics was session-based, built around visits and pageviews. The measurement approach changed. Because the whole model differs, GA4 reports and metrics look and behave differently.
Why did Google retire Universal Analytics?
Google retired Universal Analytics and moved everyone to GA4, which stopped UA processing new data, to fit modern privacy, cross-device tracking and an event-based web. It was a deliberate replacement. Because UA no longer processes data, GA4 is now the standard.
What did the event-based model change?
The event model replaced fixed session metrics with flexible events, changed how conversions work, and introduced engagement metrics in place of the old bounce rate. Familiar metrics shifted. Because events underpin everything, reports needed rethinking rather than a simple copy.
What happened to my old Universal Analytics data?
Universal Analytics data did not automatically move into GA4, so historical UA figures are separate and, once access ends, need exporting to keep. History does not carry over. Because the platforms are distinct, treat GA4 as a fresh start with its own baseline.
Can you compare GA4 and UA numbers directly?
Not cleanly, because the two count things differently, so metrics like users and sessions will not match exactly between them. Direct comparison misleads. Because definitions changed, judge GA4 on its own terms rather than expecting it to mirror UA.