SEO for Therapists · Guide

How to Target Eating Disorder Therapy Searches Locally

This is the most constrained page in the series. What a practice website must not publish here is longer than what it should. The most useful content on it is written for somebody other than the person the page is about. Both of those shape everything below.

Updated: August 2026
Written by: Andrew Odgers, Managing Director
Reading time: 11 minutes
Before anything else

If You Need Help Now

This page is about arranging therapy. It is not urgent help. If you need support right now, please use one of these instead. The same applies if you are worried about somebody.

If someone is in immediate danger. Call 999.

For urgent mental health support, at any hour. Call 111 and choose the mental health option. You can also go to 111 online. Samaritans are on 116 123. You can also text SHOUT to 85258.

For specialist support. Beat, the UK eating disorder charity, has a helpline on 0808 801 0677, with webchat and email as well. Beat states calls are free from UK landlines and mobiles and do not appear on itemised bills. Their opening hours are on their own website, which is the place to check them.

Medical support may be needed too. A GP is the usual route.

Support for this is often medical as well as psychological. A GP is the ordinary way into an assessment for both. That is worth saying on any practice page covering this, without any suggestion about who it applies to.

These routes were checked in August 2026. The general ones come from NHS guidance on getting urgent mental health help.

A note for practitioners. Publish the number and not the hours.

Sources disagreed on opening hours while we were checking, so at least one is out of date. A wrong hours claim sends somebody to a closed line at a bad moment, so give the number, point to the organisation for hours and pair it with routes that are open at any time.

Two audiences, one page

Who Is Reading This

Frequently not the person themselves. Parents, partners, adult children and friends read these pages too. They arrive needing something entirely different from what the page usually offers.

What the keyword data shows about them. Nothing at all.

Our own keyword research in August 2026 found no family or carer facing terms whatsoever in this seam. Not a small number. None.

Why that is not evidence about the world. It is evidence about the file.

The export was drawn around practitioner vocabulary, so a search made by a worried parent that never uses the word therapist cannot appear in it. The absence tells us about the boundary of the data rather than about the size of the audience.

Why this is worth a whole block. The wrong reading is very costly here.

Anybody treating that zero as a market signal would remove the safest and most useful content on the page. Sizing that audience properly needs a separate export built around their language.

What the seam does contain. A small, cheap set of service searches.

The same research found 13 terms in total carrying 1,180 searches a month, with 12 of those client facing. The largest, carrying local intent, ran at 320 a month at a competitive difficulty score of roughly 12.

The block that earns the page

For Somebody Worried About Another Person

This is the safest content on the page to write and the most useful thing on it. It is also almost entirely missing from practice websites, which are written as though only one kind of reader ever arrives.

What this content is not. A list of things to look out for.

Nothing here describes anything to notice. No page should. A list of that kind is read by both audiences and for one of them it becomes something else. Scope belongs in the training rather than in observations.

What families most need to hear. That they cannot make somebody accept help.

It is the single most useful sentence available on this subject and almost nobody writes it. Somebody carrying the belief that the right words would fix this is carrying something that is not theirs to carry.

What follows from that. Support exists for them in their own right.

Not as a route to reaching the other person. For themselves. The charity named above runs services specifically for people in that position.

What a practitioner can offer them. Say it plainly.

Whether the practice works with family members directly, whether it offers a conversation to somebody unsure what to do and what happens if the person they are worried about is not ready. Three ordinary facts about the practice.

What must not appear. Advice on their situation.

No guidance on how to raise it with a particular person, no script and nothing about what to do next in any individual case. The page says what the practice offers and points to the specialist support.

Exactness, not modesty

What The Practitioner Actually Offers

Being specific about scope matters more here than on any other page in this cluster. A practitioner who is not equipped for this work should not be taking it. The website is where that gets decided.

What the page has to state. Four things, exactly.

What training the practitioner holds in this area, how long they have worked with it, which presentations within it they take and whether they work alongside medical care. All four, stated plainly rather than implied.

Why implying is the failure mode. It reads as a yes.

A page listing this among ten other things a practitioner works with has told a reader they are covered. Somebody in difficulty will take that at face value. So will a parent looking for help quickly.

What the demand actually looks like. Specific and small.

Our own keyword research in August 2026 found the unqualified service term at 210 searches a month at a competitive difficulty score of roughly 28. One named presentation within this group ran at 170 a month at roughly 21. City level terms ran between 30 and 110 a month each.

What that means without the training. Leave it entirely.

These are cheap searches. That is not a reason to write for them. This is the one page in the series where a low competitive difficulty score is a warning rather than an opportunity.

Where therapy sits

Working Within A Team

Support here is frequently medical as well as psychological. A page implying that therapy on its own is the whole answer would be wrong, in a way that matters.

What the page should describe. The working relationships.

How the practitioner works with a GP, with specialist services and with anybody else involved. Whether they ask to be in contact with them. What they do when somebody is not under other care.

Why a reader needs this. They are working out what they are arranging.

Somebody about to make contact is deciding whether this is the whole of what they need to organise. A practice that answers that question saves them discovering the answer later.

What not to turn it into. A description of when it applies.

No indication of who needs medical involvement and who does not. Naming any circumstance would set a threshold. Per block seven, this page does not set thresholds. The GP route is offered to everybody rather than to a described group.

Why this reads well rather than badly. It signals competence.

A practitioner describing how they work with others is describing something a reader can rely on. One who presents themselves as sufficient in isolation is making a claim a well informed family member will recognise.

Stated, not left implicit

What The Page Must Not Contain

Six categories, excluded outright, with the reason for each. This is set out as content guidance rather than left to judgement, because judgement is what fails when somebody is writing quickly.

No figures of any kind. Because they become targets.

No measurements, quantities, sizes or numbers relating to a person or to food. Any such figure published anywhere can be read by somebody as a benchmark, whatever the surrounding sentence intended.

No description of any behaviour. Because description instructs.

However general and however carefully framed. A page describing what people do is a page somebody can learn from. That is what the whole rule exists to prevent.

No checklist or self assessment. Because it invites a verdict.

Anything a reader can score themselves against turns the page into an assessment. It is also the version practitioners most often want, because it looks helpful.

No before and after framing. Because it makes a person a project.

In words as much as in pictures. A start state and an end state applied to a human being is the shape of the thinking the work is trying to loosen.

No recovery accounts. Because they invite comparison.

Real or illustrative. Somebody reading another person's account measures themselves against it. The testimonials material rules them out on separate grounds anyway.

No prevalence or mortality figures. Because they alarm without helping.

Neither changes what a reader should do next. Both change how frightened they are while deciding.

One sentence, written carefully

The Fear Of Not Being Ill Enough

A great many people delay asking for help because they have decided they do not qualify for it. Addressing that is among the most useful things a page can do. It is also the easiest thing on the page to get wrong.

What the page can say. That help does not depend on a threshold.

That the practice sees people at every point and that nobody has to reach any particular position before getting in touch. It is a statement about who the practitioner works with.

What it must not do. Describe the threshold it is dismissing.

No mention of what would or would not qualify, no comparison between readers and no wording that implies a scale exists with somebody on it. Naming a threshold in order to say it does not apply still names it.

Why reassurance about the reader is barred too. It is an assessment.

Telling somebody their difficulties are serious enough is a judgement about a person the practitioner has never met. The safe version says nothing about the reader at all and everything about the practice.

The test that decides it. The subject of the sentence.

If the sentence is about the reader, it is barred. If it is about who the practice sees, it is available.

Why it is worth the care. It has no search demand.

Nobody types this. It will never appear in a report. It is frequently the paragraph that results in somebody getting in touch.

Low pressure, said in advance

What A First Contact Involves

Describe the first contact rather than the first session, because for a good number of readers here the two are separated by weeks and a decision.

What the reader is weighing. Whether contact commits them.

Somebody unsure they want to do this at all needs to know that getting in touch is not the same as starting. A practice that says so removes the barrier without asking anything.

What to say about the message itself. That very little is needed.

A name, a way to reply and a sentence. Nothing has to be explained in advance and no form should require it. The same holds for a family member making contact.

What happens next, set out plainly. The sequence.

Whether the reply is an email or a call, whether there is a conversation before anything is booked and what it is for. Uncertainty is the obstacle, so removing it is the content.

What must not be promised. Anything about the work.

No number of sessions, no timescale and nothing about what therapy will achieve. The first contact is described. What follows it is not characterised at all.

The contents list

What The Page Has To Contain

Seven things. Signposting first, then who the practitioner works with, the training held, how they work alongside medical care, what a first contact involves, the fee and a contact route with almost nothing in it.

Which one is not optional. The first.

At the top of the page, above the practice content, in ordinary text rather than in an alert box. An alarm styling would add to a reader this page exists to avoid alarming.

Who owns it afterwards. Somebody named.

Organisations merge and numbers change. This needs a person and a review date. Per block one, the hours are checked with the organisation rather than repeated on the page.

What the family content adds. A section of its own.

Per block three, written for somebody worried about another person and reachable without going through content addressed to the person themselves. Two audiences, so two routes through the page.

What is deliberately absent. Everything in block six.

No figures, no behaviour descriptions, no checklist, no before and after, no accounts and no statistics. If a draft starts to describe anything somebody could measure themselves against, it comes out.

How we work on it

How We Target It

Three things, plus one absolute prohibition that sits above all of them.

What is never targeted. Any term describing a behaviour, a method or a target.

At any volume, in any campaign, for any client. Our own keyword research in August 2026 found none of that kind in this particular file, so there was nothing to remove here. The rule stands regardless of what any future export contains.

Help seeking language. Where the small demand actually is.

The service terms and the local ones, which per block two are few and cheap. Twelve client facing terms is not a content programme. It is two pages, written properly.

Family facing content, on its own merits. Not on a volume argument.

Per block two, this file cannot see that audience, so we do not pretend to have sized it. We recommend the content because it is useful and safe. We would size it with a separate export built around their language before making any claim about it.

The specialism itself, stated plainly. Only where held.

Per block four, this is the one page where a low competitive difficulty score is a warning. We ask for the training before we build anything.

What we measure. First contacts, split by audience.

Messages and calls, separated into those from the person themselves and those from somebody else. The second group is invisible in ordinary reporting and frequently the larger one.

Where the rest is explained. The connected pages.

The page carrying the practitioner and the scope is therapist about page SEO, the material on stating training so it can be checked is BACP and UKCP accreditation and SEO and the claims position underneath all of this is how SEO works for mental health professionals. Our approach is on the SEO for therapists page and the series in our SEO guides for therapists.

SEO for therapists

Written for
both readers.

The signposting placed first and kept current, the training and scope stated exactly, a route through the page for somebody worried about another person, the excluded categories held without exception, with first contacts reported by audience.

What is included every month:

Google Maps optimisation Full website management SEO campaign AI optimisation (GEO) Facebook Instagram LinkedIn Quarterly audits Monthly reporting
£350 per month, fixed

One monthly rate covering everything listed above. No setup fee. Nothing billed separately.

The full guide series

Every guide.
One profession.

The compliance position, accreditation and registration, the about page, testimonials handled properly, the other issue and modality pages, online delivery, corporate work, private client strategy and the comparison with health services, directories and platforms.

Questions people ask

Targeting This Presentation

Where does the signposting go and what should it say?
At the top of the page, above the practice content, in ordinary text rather than an alert box. Name specialist support alongside routes that are open at any hour. Say that support is often medical as well as psychological with a GP as the usual way in. Give numbers rather than opening hours, since hours change and a wrong one sends somebody to a closed line.
Is it worth writing this page at all given the search volume?
If you are trained in it, yes. Our own keyword research in August 2026 found 13 terms carrying 1,180 searches a month, with the largest local term at a competitive difficulty score of roughly 12. Small and cheap. If you are not trained in it, the low score is a warning rather than an opportunity and the page should not exist.
You say families are a major audience but found no searches. Which is it?
Both. The distinction matters. Our own keyword research in August 2026 found no family or carer facing terms in this seam at all, because the export was built around practitioner vocabulary and a worried parent's search does not contain the word therapist. That is a limit of the file rather than a finding about the audience. Sizing it needs a separate export.
Can I list things for families to look out for?
No. A list of that kind is read by both audiences and for one of them it becomes something else. Write instead about what your practice offers a family member, that they cannot make somebody accept help and that support exists for them in their own right. Point to the specialist charity for the rest.
How do I address somebody who thinks they are not unwell enough?
Make the sentence about your practice rather than about them. That you see people at every point and that nobody has to reach any particular position before getting in touch. Do not describe the threshold you are dismissing, because naming it still names it. Do not reassure anybody about their own situation either, because that is an assessment.
What should I measure?
First contacts, split into those from the person themselves and those from somebody else. The second group does not show up in ordinary reporting and is frequently the larger one. Traffic alone will tell you very little on a page with two audiences and a very small keyword seam.